Our resources

A selection of publications and sources relating to our work – we’ll keep adding to this, and welcome your suggestions.

 

Highlights

Rephrain report cover

Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse

There is a pressing challenge of bridging the gap between the complexities of defining and classifying technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse (CSEA) and effective and appropriate responses and protection measures. Building on insights from new research and a statistical analysis of the Disrupting Harm evidence, the report sets out six principles by which diverse stakeholders can reach an agreement in understanding and responding to technology-facilitated CSEA. Read the report

Smartphone policies cover

Smartphone policies in schools: What does the evidence say?

Smartphone ‘bans’ in schools may seem the obvious policy to address the concerns about the impact of digital technology on education. But do they work? The DFC gathered evidence from around the world. We found that school smartphone policies vary considerably and most implement restrictions of one kind or another rather than outright bans. Read the report

Impact of regulation front cover

Impact of regulation on children’s digital lives

A report by Steve Wood, founder of PrivacyX Consulting and ex-ICO Deputy Commissioner reveals that regulation focused on children’s privacy and safety is starting to have a substantive impact, most importantly through changes that design in protections by default. Read report

Code of practice for EdTech Cover

EdTech needs a code of practice

The DFC recently published two research briefs and proposed a code of practice for EdTech

International regulatory decisions concerning EdTech companies’ data practices: this shows the extent of recent government actions against Google Workspace for Education’s treatment of children’s data.

Enforcement action improves privacy for children in education: more is needed. A brief analysis of recent changes to policies and practice in Google’s Workspace for Education: this shows that recent government actions have led to improvements in Google’s policies, but these are still insufficient.

A Code of Practice for EdTech supported by a certification scheme would make it easier for schools to use technology for the benefit of children confidently and in a way that respects child rights and create pathways for beneficial sharing of education data for innovation.

Best interests cover

Best Interests of the Child in the Digital Environment

Children’s best interests must be a primary consideration in the digital world but what that means is often misunderstood or even misused. Our report shows the importance of seeking best interests determination only in situations where several of child’s rights are in tension or where third-party claims jeopardise children’s rights. Read report

 Publications and resources

For resources from the 5Rights Foundation see here.